<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People of the UK! Let&#8217;s Show we Care about Government Openness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/01/people-of-the-uk-lets-show-we-care-about-government-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/01/people-of-the-uk-lets-show-we-care-about-government-openness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Morris</title>
		<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/01/people-of-the-uk-lets-show-we-care-about-government-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quixoticquisling.com/?p=312#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Great idea Tony. I&#039;ve already spread that link and I&#039;m commenting right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea Tony. I&#8217;ve already spread that link and I&#8217;m commenting right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hirst</title>
		<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/01/people-of-the-uk-lets-show-we-care-about-government-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quixoticquisling.com/?p=312#comment-196</guid>
		<description>How about forcing a little more openness in government consultations and requests for comments too? For example, why not comment directly on the Digital Britain interim report? http://writetoreply.org/digitalbritain/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about forcing a little more openness in government consultations and requests for comments too? For example, why not comment directly on the Digital Britain interim report? <a href="http://writetoreply.org/digitalbritain/">http://writetoreply.org/digitalbritain/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

