<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Season &#8211; selections on a theme of openness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/06/open-season-selections-on-a-theme-of-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/06/open-season-selections-on-a-theme-of-openness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff worth reading about openness &#124; Quixotic Quisling</title>
		<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/06/open-season-selections-on-a-theme-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-7897</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff worth reading about openness &#124; Quixotic Quisling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quixoticquisling.com/?p=530#comment-7897</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote about it here in June 2009. Just mentioning it again as some of the recent articles I&#8217;ve read have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote about it here in June 2009. Just mentioning it again as some of the recent articles I&#8217;ve read have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/06/open-season-selections-on-a-theme-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-2363</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quixoticquisling.com/?p=530#comment-2363</guid>
		<description>Unlocked, unlatched so watch where your going.
Unsecured, loose, unzipped en definitely not done up. 
Unsheltered, vulnerable and exposed to abuse.

Open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlocked, unlatched so watch where your going.<br />
Unsecured, loose, unzipped en definitely not done up.<br />
Unsheltered, vulnerable and exposed to abuse.</p>
<p>Open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mei</title>
		<link>http://quixoticquisling.com/2009/06/open-season-selections-on-a-theme-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quixoticquisling.com/?p=530#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>&quot;A car doesn’t have source code.&quot;

In a strong sense the plans and design documents from which it&#039;s made _are_ its source code. Anyone with the means to compile (manufacture) the car can take those docs and build the exact same car. There are plenty of open source hardware projects around http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_hardware

Other than that you&#039;re right, &#039;open&#039; is usually an analogy and a frequently deceptive one at that, companies claiming to be open in some vague way that&#039;s supposed to make us like them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A car doesn’t have source code.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a strong sense the plans and design documents from which it&#8217;s made _are_ its source code. Anyone with the means to compile (manufacture) the car can take those docs and build the exact same car. There are plenty of open source hardware projects around <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_hardware">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_hardware</a></p>
<p>Other than that you&#8217;re right, &#8216;open&#8217; is usually an analogy and a frequently deceptive one at that, companies claiming to be open in some vague way that&#8217;s supposed to make us like them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

