Darllena’r llyfr ac Here Comes Everybody, dyna ni – fy adolygiad.

Y peth pwysicaf yw, dyw Shirky ddim wedi gorffen y llyfr. Dw i’n gofyn mwy o gwestiynau ar ôl y llyfr. Bydd rhaid i ni gorffen y waith. Dw i ddim yn siarad am adeiladu busnesu neu y Google nesaf; dw i’n siarad, fel Shirky, am mudiadau, newid, datrys problemau. Mae’r maes dal yn hollol agored.

Dw i’n methu anghytuno gyda Shirky yma ar tudalen 180 (clawr meddal):

The choice we face is this: out of the mass of our shared cognitive surplus, we can create an Invisible University – many Invisible Colleges doing the hard work of creating many kinds of public and civic value – or we can settle for Invisible High School, where we get lolcats but no open source software, fan fiction but no improvement in medical research. The Invisible High School is already widespread, and our ability to participate in ways that reward personal or communal value is in no imminent danger…

Creating real public or civic value, though, requires more than posting funny pictures.

Mae Shirky yn atgoffa fi o’i ffrind Tim O’Reilly yma, gweithia ar bethau pwysig – a phaid â taflu defaid.

Ond mae gweithgareddau chwaraeus yn bwydo’r projectau pwysig. Dyw’r gweddill ddim yn gweithio fel ‘na yn fy mhrofiad. Er enghraifft, addysgodd Sleeveface fi llawer mwy na fasai unrhyw un yn disgwyl gyda ‘lluniau doniol’. Nawr dw i ddim wedi trwsio llawer o broblemau cyhoedd neu dinesig chwaith ond o leia dw i’n meddwl amdanyn nhw bob dydd.

Wrth gwrs mae Sleeveface yn llawer well na lolcats! Ond mae Shirky wedi ateb ei pwynt ei hun gynt ar tudalen 18:

Let’s nominate the procss of making a lolcat as the stupidest possible creative act… Formed quickly and with a minimum of craft, the average lolcat image has the social value of a whoopee cushion and the cultural life span of a mayfly. Yet anyone seeing a lolcat gets a second, related message: You can play this game too…

… a change from what we’re used to in the media landscape. The stupidest possible creative act is still a creative act…

Much of the objection to lolcats focuses on how stupid they are; even a funny lolcat doesn’t amount to much. On the spectrum of creative work, the difference between the mediocre and the good is vast. Mediocrity is, however, still on the spectrum; you can move from mediocre to good in increments. The real gap is between doing nothing and doing something, and someone making lolcats has bridged that gap.

Fel ffrind o’r iaith dw i bach yn cenfigennus o diwylliannau gyda’r gweddill.

Dyn ni wedi elwa gyda WordPress, Firefox ayyb a phaid anghofio Wicipedia Cymraeg.

Ond mae’r sefyllfa dal yn teimlo fel bod Shirky a’i ffrindiau wedi cyrraedd at tudalen 180 ond dyn ni dal ar tudalen 18, mewn ffordd. (Mae fe’n gallu cymryd teledu yn ganiataol hefyd ond stori arall.)

Dyw’r hanes o ddatblygiadau cyfryngau ddim yn ‘damweiniol’. (Gweler hefyd: Nicholas Carr a defnydd ‘accidentalism’ gan Shirky).

Rwyt ti’n gallu gweld hwn yn mudiadau cerddorol. Daw punk a wedyn post-punk. Roedd punk yn angenrheidiol fel chwildro DIY.

DIY arlein

Felly beth yw’r peth mwyaf ‘punk’ ti’n gallu postio arlein?

Dw i ddim yn siarad am gerddoriaeth punk o’r 70au yn enwedig, dw i’n siarad am yr agwedd.

Bydd rhaid i ni torri trwy’r ceidwadaeth o gymdeithas Cymraeg hefyd. Gwnes i trio esbonio PenTalarPedia i rhywun mis diwetha. Atebodd hi ‘ond dyw e ddim yn rhywbeth swyddogol‘…

Tro nesaf, gofynais i ‘oh wnest ti ymweld PenTalarPedia ar y diwedd?’. Atebodd hi ‘Do. Mae’n anghyflawn. O’n i eisiau gweld y lleoliadau saethu’.

Cyfryngau newydd go iawn, Lost a Lostpedia

Dyn ni dal ar y cyfnod ‘mynd i’r capel mewn Levis’ gydag arlein.

Wedyn ti’n gallu cael dy Geraint Jarman, dy Datblygu, dy Tŷ Gwydr, dy SFA, dy Gorky’s a dy Tystion.

Dim sylwadau. Pingnôl punk yn unig.

Mae awdur Simone Pereira de Sá (o’r Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brasil) yn siarad am theori ddiwylliannol, fformatau cerddoriaeth gorfforol a chyfryngau. Mae’n edrych yn ddiddorol iawn ond dw i ddim yn gallu deall Portiwgaleg felly dw i’n defnyddio Google Translate am y tro.

Sgwennais i gofnod ar Sleeveface.com gyda’r manylion eraill. Rhaid i bob cofnod ar Sleeveface.com cael llun o Sleeveface. Mae e’n rheol. Tro yma, wnes i ddefnyddio hen lun o’r archif gyda Paul McCartney. Roedden ni’n bwriadu defnyddio fe yn y llyfr Sleeveface. Ond doedd dim digon o le yn y llyfr am y llun. Dw i’n hoffi’r llun achos mae camera yn y llaw a Macca yw’r artist gwreiddiol wnes i sleevefaco ym Muffalo Bar, Caerdydd yn 2007.

The venue is MIT in Boston, USA where a few notable tech things were born (like one of my favourites – the free software movement).

Entschuldigung! Germany now has its own edition of the Sleeveface book. The book is out now through the Cadeau imprint of German publisher Hoffmann und Campe.

You can get more info on the German edition at the main Sleeveface site. The original version of the book is also out now.

Still on the web: my original post about the book, with a little bit of help from Malcolm McLaren.

And finally: Bagism.

Sleeveface the book is out now!

Sleeveface has a dedicated blog of its own, so I’ll try not to duplicate too much here. It also has more info about the book.

At the moment we are doing a real mixed bag of press and radio interviews. Sunday Times magazine carried a feature recently, this afternoon I’ve just been speaking to the Irish Examiner, then soon it’s National Public Radio in the USA.

It’s particularly been a joy to chat to the Welsh language media. Recently I’ve met with Wedi 7 and Bandit which are cultural TV shows on S4C and the C2 show on BBC Radio Cymru. If I made any grammatical mistakes with the Welsh, I hope they at least made you laugh.

People have asked if I predicted this would happen with Sleeveface. Well I knew I liked it and I could easily imagine the record and photo geeks getting into it. But this is ridiculous. And great.

So I was glad that David Bowie, the ultimate chameleon, likes it. It was great to read a comment from fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld.

But it’s just as fun to see ANYBODY enjoying it. As former Pistols manager Malcolm McClaren put it:

Sleeveface is the most brooding, sullen, sexy as hell way to prolong the death of our culture. Long live the record! Resurrection is part of the hero’s journey. Renewing, revitalizing, reappraising pop culture in ways no industry could ever dream of. Hats off to these Rock ‘n’ Roll creeps from Wales! DIY adulation and worship of these now ancient deities deserve all our most fashionable darlings’ attention and all art crazies desperate to be the next big thing at the Biennale. Unfathomable!!! Unquestionably this attitude gets all those pop legends back from the dead and inside, on top, to the left and right of the liver and kidney body parts of the next generation. Who says they are not Patti Smith? Elton John? David Bowie? Tim Buckley? Elvis? Who says? Who says?

At the beginning I thought Sleeveface was daft. And I still think it’s daft! The new pics that I get still have the capacity to make me laugh out loud.

Thanks to John, the gang and everyone who helped with the book, especially those who sent photos. If you’re one of those people who contributed, I’ve emailed you personally.

There are probably thousands of videos like this. If you prefer, you can have Japanese people making mechanical versions of Super Mario. Or maybe BristleBots.

All around the web people are doing fun stuff, posting it up and inspiring others. But if you are anything like them, you may have occasionally been told that you have “too much time on your hands”. This comment is reserved for those who cultivate a special interest in something. Maybe something a little unusual or esoteric.

So you painstakingly assemble giant dominoes from smaller dominoes, do you?

Or maybe you re-enact historical battles?

Or collect stuff?

Or you know your way down a list of real ales or northern soul tunes? (Those two usually go together.)

In the United Kingdom (N55:56:58 W3:9:37) we used to be very suspicious of anoraks. By that I mean, not the coats themselves but the people – usually blokes – who wear them. If you don’t follow UK slang, anorak is almost synonymous with the word geek or nerd. They have a fixation or obsessive interest in something. (The way it usually differs from the archetypal geek is that the pursuit of an anorak doesn’t necessarily have a creative aspect.)

Back in school days, I remember showing a teacher a sprite animation engine I had programmed in C. I mentioned how it was the basis of a new computer game I was writing in my free time. I expected maybe a discussion of how I could improve or develop the idea. To my surprise, this IT teacher responded by calling me a “sad git”.

If you’re out there, Ms Hatcher, feel free to drop me a line as I’d love to show you all the fun and cool stuff I’ve been doing since then, in spite of your discouragement. Ha! No hard feelings.

What’s the implication of the original comment – berating enthusiasts for having “too much time on their hands”? I believe it’s the fact they’re nonconformists. They don’t subscribe to the work ethic that dictates you must be immediately useful all of the time. The subtext? If you’re not focusing purely on the tasks set for you, you’re not being “productive” and must be wasting your energy. Well, a counter-revolution to this poisonous idea is forming. Read Quitting The Paint Factory or almost anything from The Idler.

I can’t always explain geek or anorak behaviour. Like the appeal of jotting down endless lists of train numbers on a Saturday afternoon. But I do know that those people get a lot of joy out of it. They might retort by asking about the appeal of sitting passively in an armchair at home alone – watching, say, the TV show Friends.

These days of course, there’s a rising geek quotient in the media too. (Anyone care to plot this on a graph?) It’s what Stephen Hawking, Quentin Tarantino, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates have in common. I’m aware the latter and Microsoft (MSFT) get criticism from uber-geeks for their company’s products and dominance – but that just adds to the geek credentials for both parties. Those uber-geeks have more in common with Bill Gates than they’d care to admit. Such bitching and quarrelling is expected in any sidelined or alternative group of people. Besides, the real disdain is reserved for Steve Ballmer, on the basis that he’s a pure ruthless businessman. Importantly for them, he’s not known for writing even a single line of computer code. What a fraud eh!

The author and speaker Clay Shirky talks about society having time on its hands but he prefers to call it a cognitive surplus.

(With a surname like that, he should write for The Idler.)

Here’s an insightful speech Shirky did at some geek expo earlier this year. He defines the cognitive surplus and talks about the benefits of consuming, producing and sharing – as well as the phenomena of “lolcats” and “grown men sitting in their basement pretending to be elves”. There’s a transcript but check out the video:

The cognitive surplus has made me see our Sleeveface exploits in a new way. Not only did technology and social networking help it to spread, but people have the urge to take part because of new habits of recreation and participation. Look out for the book!

Passivity is, literally, lame. So, make sure you write your own definition of cool. Develop your interests and keep on having fun.